I got a reply from Representative Brad Ashford
Posted On July 28, 2015
Recently, I poked all the state representatives and senators about upcoming Net Neutrality legistlation that the telecoms have snuck into next year’s, must pass, funding bill. And Ashford send me a response. I know, it’s a form letter, but the return address seemed legit. He may never actually read my thoughts on his response, but that doesn’t mean you lovely people can’t! Here’s his response:
Thank you for contacting my office regarding net neutrality. I appreciate your interest in issues affecting our country and state.
The internet was built to be an equal distribution system. Net neutrality is an effort to solidify the internet as a neutral vehicle for data transfer, as in sending and receiving emails, streaming video, conducting commerce, etc. Concerns have been raised about network providers placing restrictions or discriminatory practices on their networks for different content.
I support an open internet, and oppose blocking, throttling, or the creation of “fast lanes.” We need to foster an open and transparent broadband infrastructure for all Nebraskans, which can grow our economy, and enhance our lives. However, we must be careful not to burden businesses with excessive regulation as this may stunt their vital investment in telecommunication infrastructure.
Again, thank you for sharing your concerns with me. As always, I am open to learning more from you and I appreciate you taking the time to express your views. You may find more useful resources for keeping up with my work by visiting my website https://ashford.house.gov/. I am honored to represent you in Congress.
Member of Congress
And here is what I have to say in response to the honorable Representative:
The telecom industry seems to be remarkably unconcerned with “investing in telecommunication infrastructure” so I don’t really see how regulating them so they are less able to take advantage of their near monopoly will do any harm. Where I live, right in the middle of downtown Omaha, I have exactly one choice if I want high speed internet, advertised to me with the term “up to 100mbps” and I am luck most days to receive 20 mbps. In fact, I don’t think I have, even once in two years as their customer seen 100mbps, even when I was paying for 150. That’s it. I choose Cox, or I don’t get high speed internet.
Combine that with Time Warner and Comcast bringing lawsuits against cities that wish to build their own fiber network that provide reliable gigabit speeds for the same price I’m paying for 20 mbps because its “anti-competitive” and I have remarkably little concern for how these multi-billion dollar industries are burdened by regulation. I’m a web developer, so my livelihood is closely related to the well being of the internet. Not only do I develop web sites for the University of Nebraska, but I also am trying to get a web page of my own off the ground. Seeing the telecom industry actively avoiding investing in infrastructure, and then attempting to keep others from doing so all while saying they should be protected from regulation so they can invest in infrastructure is infuriating.
We know the amount of money that the telecoms spend in Washington every year, and we see bills like this one keep coming up, with protections and considerations for the telecoms, but not for anyone else. It may not be you, Representative, but its the system and I’m tired of it. The massive profits of corporations like Time Warner and Comcast do not need your protection, we your constituents do. We don’t need to avoid regulating the telecoms, we need to place incentives to drive competition. I need two more (minimum) options to get high-speed internet where I live. That, and only that, will encourage Cox, Time Warner and the other service providers to bring new technology like fiber to Nebraska at an affordable price…or at least get them to stop lying to me about the service they provide for the ridiculous price they charge me for it. Don’t keep the telecoms in mind when you’re voting, keep me in mind, because you’re representing me, not the telecoms.
Like I said…he’ll probably never read a word of it. But just maybe he will, and maybe … Nah. It’ll be ignored because, really, do I have millions of dollars and thus any influence at all? Nope. Oh well, on with the day.